*****NEW UPDATE - 12/22/19*****
I'm happy to say that finally after 7 years in a Philippine court, on
November 15, 2019 my case has been DISMISSED PERMANENTLY.
UPDATE:
US man cleared of rape after 5 years in Philippine jail
US man cleared of rape after 5 years
in Philippine jail
By
Teresa Cerojana (Associated Press) | Updated
August 2, 2016 - 6:45pm
A court in metropolitan Manila
cleared Scott McMahon, of Seattle, after finding no clear evidence that he
committed rape. Freescottmcmahon.com
MANILA, Philippines — An American
man jailed in the Philippines for more than five years was freed Tuesday after
being acquitted of rape.
A court in metropolitan Manila
cleared Scott McMahon, of Seattle, after finding no clear evidence that he
committed rape, as a Filipino woman alleged, a court official said on condition
of anonymity because he was not authorized to talk to reporters.
A jail officer, Omar Surigao, said
that after the acquittal, McMahon was released from the Muntinlupa City jail in
metropolitan Manila. He said McMahon's mother, Shelley Campanella, was among
those present when McMahon was released.
McMahon, who has two children with
his Filipino fiancee, had been detained since April 7, 2011.
Campanella has said that her son was
wrongly accused of rape by the woman after he filed a case against her for
allegedly traumatizing his young son.
The woman, the wife of McMahon's
friend, had allegedly burst into McMahon's home with police, shouting as she
looked for her estranged husband. The incident allegedly traumatized the son.
"We are so thrilled that this
part of the nightmare is over and that Scott will not be spending another day
in prison," McMahon's sister, Jennifer, said in a video posted on
Facebook, calling the rape accusation "retaliation" by the woman for
the case McMahon had filed against her.
ALLEGED: NOT A SHRED OF INVESTIGATION
This is a true story happening in the Philippines now. It was published in The Seattle Times -
-
King County man languishes in Philippines jail fighting rape charge
Scott McMahon, who moved to the Philippines in 2003, has been held in filthy conditions in a case one lawyer says is so flimsy it wouldn’t have warranted an arrest in America.
A Seattle-area man living in the Philippines has been held in an overcrowded jail in suburban Manila for more than four years, waiting most of that time to stand trial on rape allegations that he and his supporters claim are false.
Scott McMahon, 44, a former heavy-metal guitarist-turned-construction worker from Renton, contends he’s innocent and has been wrongfully imprisoned on the word of a woman bent on retaliation after he filed a criminal complaint against her.
“It’s just preposterous,” McMahon said in a telephone interview from the Muntinlupa City Jail. “It’s just a complete frame-up. I haven’t done anything wrong.”
The Seattle Times could not locate the Filipino woman who has accused McMahon. A Muntinlupa City prosecutor involved with the case declined to comment.
No physical evidence exists that a rape occurred. Records show prosecutors have pursued the case largely based on the 48-year-old woman’s claims that her estranged husband and McMahon sexually assaulted her at her home early one morning in February 2010.
“Even if I wanted to fight and wrestle free from their tight hold, my strength was useless against their strength,” the woman alleged in an affidavit translated for this story.
The woman, who has said she is a tabloid reporter who met her husband several years earlier in a South Korean bar, first made her allegations in August 2010, six months after the rape allegedly occurred. The claims emerged a month after a judge ruled that a criminal case based on McMahon’s child-abuse complaint against the woman could proceed, records show.
This is the second time a Filipino woman has accused McMahon of rape. In 2008, prosecutors dropped charges against him after a different woman withdrew her complaint, swearing in an affidavit her rape claims were “not true.” McMahon’s supporters say that case, like the current one, involved someone trying to extort McMahon.
McMahon contends that since his latest arrest in April 2011 — an event broadcast by a Manila TV news station — an associate of his accuser has repeatedly visited him in jail, trying to persuade McMahon to pay the woman money and withdraw his complaint against her in exchange for her dropping the rape claims.
McMahon said he told the man, “That ain’t gonna happen.”
Instead, McMahon said he expects to be vindicated of the charges, which are punishable by a life sentence.
Testimony
The trial of McMahon, an American citizen who moved to the Philippines in 2003, began only last month. After the court postponed several hearings, he testified April 28. Among other things, he told the court about his accuser’s alleged extortion attempts, and that he and his family were out of town for 11 days in February 2010, including the day the rape reportedly occurred.
McMahon’s testimony came after the case dragged on for months. The court has postponed several hearings, and supporters say they’re not sure when a judge might decide the case.
“Unfortunately, I would say that being detained for long periods of time while awaiting trial in the Philippines is fairly typical,” said Carlos Conde, a Filipino researcher for Human Rights Watch, an international human-rights advocacy group.
Meantime, McMahon, whose fiancé and two children are Filipino citizens, remains in jail. In September, a judge denied his bail petition from three years earlier.
“The court holds that there is strong evidence of guilt against the accused which warrants the denial of his motion for admission to bail,” the judge wrote.
Shelley Campanella, McMahon’s mother, described the drawn-out proceedings as a kangaroo court. “We’re stuck relying on a legal system that’s clearly broken and corrupt,” she said.
Campanella and McMahon’s sister, Jennifer Smith, who both live in the Seattle area, have launched a campaign to free McMahon, enlisting the David House Agency, a Los Angeles-based crisis-management firm.
The agency, which specializes in helping Americans imprisoned abroad on dubious accusations, helped Tacoma’s Jason Puracal win an acquittal of a wrongful drug- trafficking and money-laundering conviction in Nicaragua. The agency’s director, Eric Volz, also advised Seattle’s Amanda Knox, who last month was cleared of the wrongful conviction of a 2007 murder in Italy.
“It’s factually impossible for Scott to have committed this crime the way the prosecution says it happened,” said Volz, who was once vindicated from a wrongful murder conviction in Nicaragua.
Music student
McMahon grew up largely in Kent and Renton and attended the Art Institute in Seattle to pursue a music degree. In the mid-1990s, he started a heavy-metal band called Indika that gained modest popularity around Seattle, Campanella said.
In the late 1990s, he traveled to the Philippines and landed a construction job through family connections. He married a Filipino woman, and the couple had a son. A few years later, McMahon split from his wife and met another Filipino woman, Marnelli Abad. The couple had a daughter in 2007.
By 2008, McMahon, his fiancé and his two children, then 4 and 1, lived in a gated subdivision in Muntinlupa City, a suburb of Manila.
That fall, when a neighbor — a Belgian national named Jan Vermeulen — separated from his wife, McMahon said he let the man stay at his home. But McMahon’s generosity apparently upset Vermeulen’s wife, McMahon and his supporters contend.
In December 2008, Vermeulen’s wife complained to police that her husband and McMahon beat her during an argument at her home. Both men were arrested, though charges eventually were dismissed, court records show.
A few weeks after the arrests — while McMahon was still in jail based on the assault claims — the Philippines’ Bureau of Immigration raided McMahon’s home, records show.
Vermeulen, who was staying at the home at the time, said in a telephone interview his ex-wife orchestrated the raid through her police contacts after he separated from her. “She came in with a TV news camera team and two guys from immigration,” Vermeulen said.
During the raid, Vermeulen said he was arrested and McMahon’s family traumatized. Eventually, Vermeulen was deported with no charges pending against him, he said.
Meantime, McMahon was released from jail. Soon, his son began suffering nightmares and grew generally fearful in the raid’s aftermath, records say. A psychologist later diagnosed the boy with post-traumatic stress, and McMahon filed a complaint against the woman for causing it.
In August 2010, a month after a court ruled a criminal child-abuse case could proceed against the woman based on McMahon’s complaint, she went to police to claim McMahon and her husband had raped her, records show.
In court papers, the woman claimed the rape occurred six months earlier at her house but that she didn’t tell police about the rape earlier partly because her husband had threatened her.
Legal team
Based on her allegations, McMahon was arrested in April 2011 — shortly before a hearing on the woman’s child-abuse case.
Volz, the David House Agency director, has recruited legal experts to McMahon’s cause, including the California Innocence Project (CIP), a California Western School of Law program dedicated to vindicating wrongfully convicted inmates.
Michael Semanchik, a CIP attorney who last fall attended some of McMahon’s bail hearings, said the case against McMahon is so flimsy it wouldn’t have warranted an arrest in America.
“If the authorities in the Philippines would have done even a shred of an investigation, they would’ve quickly realized that Scott couldn’t have done this,” he said.
During a bail hearing, a witness told the court he and his family had been with McMahon and his family on the day of the alleged rape in a town eight-hour drive from the woman’s home. A prosecutor countered McMahon could have taken an hourlong flight back to Muntinlupa City to commit the crime.
In October, McMahon’s legal team sent a brief to the U.S. State Department detailing due process violations and other case flaws. A State Department spokesman acknowledged the department is aware of McMahon’s case, but declined to comment about it.
Conde, the human-rights advocate, said he has visited McMahon in jail, describing the conditions there as “filthy and overcrowded with an overpowering stench.” That’s not uncommon for Philippine jails, he added.
Source:
10 comments:
Cases like this are common here in the Philippines as I've mentioned previously. This is also how the justice system works if you're a foreigner. A Filipina / Filipino can say anything they want against you and they'll believe the Filipina / Filipino always taking their side, even if it's not true. I can relate to this story because it has happened to me personally, and is still happening to me more then 3 years later.
In my situation this is what happened to me:
NOTE: THIS HAPPENED TO ME AT THE SAME POLICE STATION THAT
CHIEF INSP. WILDEMAR TIU - (POLICE BRUTALITY SEEN IN 11 YEAR OLD GIRL'S DEATH) IS AT.
1) When the police came to my hotel room they told me that they wanted to talk to me. I said then let's talk here. They replied I have to come with them.
2) When we arrived at the police station, they immediately through me in a holding cell and left me there. No one ever questioned me and there was no investigation. They only listened to the allegations the Filipina made.
3) They never read me my rights and never told me what my charges are.
4) They did NOT allow me to call my embassy, or an attorney, or anyone. No calls and no contact with anyone.
5) The police gave a script to the newspapers and TV news as to what to say about me before I was even formally charged. I was made to appear guilty before even being charged or in court.
6) When I had appointments with the prosecutor the police would make sure I was late and missed my chance to talk with the prosecutor.
7) The police and others called my family and friends harassing them and lying to them.
8) The police went to my hotel room without a warrant and took possessions of mine.
9) The police fabricated evidence against me.
10) The police kept me in their holding cell for 20 days with NO food, minimal water to drink, wearing the same clothes, unable to wash or shave, and NO needed medical attention.
11) The police took me to the city jail after the 20 days, where I waited 5 months for my first arraignment in court. The police also arranged to have me greeted by gang members to beat me up when I arrived at this jail.
There is much more that I can tell you. But, I think that you get the picture from what I've told you thus far.
Read this story to see more of how foreigners receive justice in this country.
In the Philippines when your arrested it will usually be for or connected to some vice.... drugs... drinking and driving or women .... When and if your arrested don't be a foreigner and try to explain away what ever your accused of doing, take a lesson from the locals and shut up .... Unlike the court system in the west there is NO jury... So if your caught red handed realize it and start working on a way to fix the problem .... Try your hardest to STAY OUT OF THE NEWS... And cover your face if someone is taking pictures...You have no rights so don't act like you do .. Also note to self ... Before you hire a lawyer call a friend ... if 20 people in a row do the same thing and your number 21 don't be shocked if your the one arrested .. Seems many guys hire the first lawyer referred to them and that lawyer may not be the correct lawyer for you ... some lawyer are annulment lawyers ,,, and they often know what is required and expected to get to a good result ,, then there are criminal lawyers ,,, business lawyers etc... not all lawyers are good at all things..
BEWARE!!!! In the Philippines you're presumed guilty until proven guilty.
As a added note to the first comment in line item #9, the Filipina and a couple foreigners along with the police fabricated the plan to entrap me, fabricated her sworn statement, fabricated evidence, and fabricated the charges. All what I have stated can be proven. Not one person has asked me about what I had to say in my defense. I was just made to appear guilty and presumed guilty of what the Filipina claimed.
Foreigners are automatically presumed guilty regardless of whether or not the allegations are true or not.
As a foreigner they will slander you without any real evidence or investigation, just on the Filipina's allegations. The media does not even verify the facts, they just report what the police tell them to say, like puppets.
Filipinas will commonly accuse foreign men of rape as a ploy to extort money. Usually, the police are part of the setup and extortion plot for their share of the pie. The Filipina's family and friends will be part of her extortion plot as well.
They do not generally do this to Filipinos. They will specifically target foreigner men as a means of extorting money from them.
BEWARE: Filipinas are NOT to be trusted in anything they say or do!!!!
WATCH YOUR SIX!!!!
The Philippines is a country that violates human rights and treats people inhumanely routinely. Be aware of this!!!!
UPDATE:
At my last hearing it was observed that it was made blatantly obvious to me, as well as to others, that the court translator has taken an increasingly deep personal involvement with the Filipina complainant and Prosecutor against me. Thus, confirming my previous suspicions. Scripting the Filipina complainant to tell blatant lies, perjuring her testimony and feeding the judge incomplete information in an effort to influence the court to be biased against me. The court translator crossed the ethical line and violated the oath of her position in the court. Abusing her position in the court and abusing her influence over the judge with demoralizing attempts to bias the court against me. Thus, denying me an unbiased impartial hearing. This is an abuse of power and a violation of my Constitutional Right to Due Process, to a Fair Impartial Trial, and Innocent Until Proven Guilty. Instead, this court translator is vigorously working to promoting me to the court to be “Guilty Until Proven Guilty”. It’s a “Kangaroo Court/Witch Hunt” against me.
AS AN ADDED NOTE:
This case should have been dismissed from the beginning. At a minimum, based on these grounds:
1) I was NOT Mirandized. Nobody read me my rights.
2) I was denied contact with Legal Counsel.
3) I was denied contact with my Embassy.
4) I was denied needed medical care.
5) Inhumane treatment – No food or Hygiene for 20 days.
6) Illegal search and seizure of personal property.
7) Entrapment
8) Complainant fabricated and perjured her allegations. She was scripted by 2 foreigners.
9) Fabricated allegations. Perjured testimony by complainant.
10) PNP (Police) fabricated charges and evidence. Perjured testimony.
11) Violated my Constitutional Rights.
12) Violated my right to Due Process under the Constitution.
13) PNP and complainant scripted the newspapers and TV news what to print and say to make me appear as Public Enemy #1. Purposely, pure lies and fabrication. As well as, pure slander and libel.
14) Broke the chain of custody of alleged evidence.
UPDATE:
At the last court hearing, the Filipina complainant wasn’t there. When my attorney made note of that for the record, the court translator spoke on behalf of the Filipina complainant again, saying “I think she’s coming.” My attorney objected to this behavior of the court translator constantly speaking for the complainant on her behalf to the judge. The court translator also mentioned that the prosecutor was not available as well. The judge defended the court translator’s behavior. It is, however, on record now in the court transcript.
*****NEW UPDATE - 12/22/19*****
I'm happy to say that finally after 7 years in a Philippine court, on
November 15, 2019 my case has been DISMISSED PERMANENTLY.
Post a Comment